1. But really, inside family history, we all knowthat for every rule there clearly was an exemption. An excellent vexing section ofgenealogy would be the fact no body very understands how to make use of the brand new conditions orrules that have one definitive adjective such as for instance constantly, possibly, most likely,probably, etcetera. It could be fascinating when the here other instances ofjointures are made a-year otherwise several after a known marriage date.
2. Can there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation on relationships regarding ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who were 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, immediately after taken off this new 5th LordClifford? That would narrow down its marriage time.
Arthur
Presumably, when the a dispensation is looked for and you can offered, it would havebeen from the among the after the, that will appear in the latest correspondingregister guide, whether or not it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop away from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In case the tenth Lord Clifford do get married in early 1487 [state January] andhas Age later where seasons, does the fresh new chronology maybe not work?
John palms?
Age produced when you look at the late 1487, Henry born in the 1488/9, Joan from inside the ,an such like. completing the latest names of publish away from . If (a) thechronology however functions; and you may (b) her wedding part was not lowest; thenwe only have the fresh 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s that’s in oppositionto new conjecture one she try a legitimate child.
6. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Will be the Clifford daughters new onlyknown Henry VII interactions omitted? Are there other people? In this case,would not one mirror improperly with this file as a resource?
From reviews I have produced from the newest c.1505 Henry VII Interactions pedigreeswith the 1480-1500 Visitation of North pedigrees, being
In the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, the newest Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin a great Clifford pedigree, but alternatively about St. John pedigree. Just like the I’mnot accustomed the St. John family relations, after the is the pointers asit appears about c.1505 pedigree, since obtained from the fresh new 1834 Coll. Top. etGen. article. The new phrasing during the quotations is precisely whilst seems inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Away from my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess from Somerset got three husbands.” Of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Lady the newest King’s Mother.” who had “The brand new Queen.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest spouse.” she got step three daus & dos sons:
A. “Edith, married to help you Geoffrey Pole regarding Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married with the Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke from Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternate youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. regarding Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun away from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his brethren and you will sistren.” That have issueindicated, but not called.C2. “Age, wedded so you https://kissbrides.com/hr/findbride-recenzija/ can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, wedded earliest towards Lord Zouche; immediately following toward LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [by the Scrope] ” Conyers.” That have issueindicated but not called.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, because of the “Lionel Lord Welles, past husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. off K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”